I just read one of the best books ever written, Dead Man Walking by Sister Helen Prejean (pray-zhahn, pictured above). It's a very blunt and forward depiction of one remarkable woman's relationship with two rapist/murderers on death row. (Actually, both denied doing the actual acts but because of circumstances were heaped with the greater condemnation than the real perpetrator, not to excuse their own participation.)
The story deals with mainly Christian Liberalism--particularly capital punishment--but also deals with themes of forgiveness and vengeance, blame guilt, action and charity. Sister Helen exemplifies all the good aspects and--I believe--what Christians ought to be. What a world it would be if all Christians loved as she does and then brought all from other faiths to love the same way! But it won't happen. Not that it can't, but it won't.
One thing in particular that I gleaned from the book is this idea, that there is no such thing as government "laissez-faire." There are only three options for government, to support actively or passively or to not support actively. There is no such thing as government not supporting something passively. In other words, if something is happening in the world--and something always is--then if government decides to do nothing, then they are supporting what is happening.
"Yes, I think domestic abuse is wrong. But it's wrong for government to interfere in relationships." You might as well say "Domestic abuse is right and good." Same inaction happens and same people are hurt. "Banks shouldn't be able to get away with all the bad business they do and stop screwing over homeowners and such, but let's just wait for the invisible hand to sort it out" is the same as "I support corrupt bad banking." "I don't like how Mexican farm laborers are treated, but they're illegal so we shouldn't have to do anything," is "I love how bad it is for them."
The same goes on a personal level and this really changed how I view charity and love. There is no such thing as passive bystanding. "I don't pick on other kids at school, but I just kind of stay out of the way" is the same thing as "I like how bullies treat and belittle other children of God." "I don't really support agribusiness, but it's just so inconvenient to buy anything else" is "Go monoculture farming!" And the biggest egocide: "I really do love these people, but I figure they just know it so I don't really have to let them know." You might as well be totally indifferent.
So the moral of Sister Helen's story--at least the one I got from it--NEVER let injustice continue without speaking out. I guarantee it will be inconvenient and uncomfortable. It might even be impossible, but you--I--need to do it anyway. Find a way.
1 Nephi 3:7,
"Feed My Sheep"